Caldwell Christine Baranski and Mrs.
Introversion, this is a common theme that defines the overall narrative of the story. Nevertheless, it could be realized that as the story develops, it is shown that being such a kind of person has its perks and advantages that makes life a bit more exciting at a rather relative condition that makes it easier for a youth to survive the challenge being able to fit in the picture with his peers.
The theme of being an introvert and the way it is presented in the novel and in the film of The Perks of Being a Wallflower specifically calls into attention the valuing of how audience-reaction is considered in each work. Through the eyes of Charlie, Chbosky tries to bring life to the specific concerns that teenagers usually have to deal with especially in relation to connecting with their peers and getting involved with groups of their interest.
To be able to define the course of life Charlie is taking, Chbosky uses letters as the means of presentation addressed by the main character to an anonymous individual.
Through descriptive words, Chbosky tries to get the attention of the readers allowing them to become part of the narration as well. Being an intellectually defined individual, Charlie is more concerned on his studies that with the idea of becoming popular or receiving the recognition he specifically deserves.
Unlike his peers, he would rather spend his time studying than spending time with friends and getting out at night for parties. This does not mean though that he does not like to have friends or be involved in some with others.
However, because of being shy, Charlie settles for what is available and what the chances have to offer for him to enjoy especially in relation to how he chooses the people he becomes friends with. The treatment on how Charlie specifically handles his situation and how specifically involved he has become with two of his closest friends provides a relative connection to the realities that teenagers usually deal with at present.
This is perhaps the reason why the transition of the book towards becoming a movie did not create so much difference. The messages wanted to be sent out by the writer were the same messages that the director wanted to show his audience.
He also wallows a lot less in the movie compared to that of the kind of character he is known for in the novel. Perhaps to create a more relative picture for the viewers, the Charlie character in the movie specifically has a capacity to relax the mental state of the audience rather than stressing them with the many behavioral complications that Charlie posses in the story.
Their existence is considered important in showing the different attitudes of Charlie and the way he develops his perception about particular matters through time. In this case, it could be realized that while the novel wants to point out that the family background of a person plays a great role on how the behavior of a person develops, the film director wants to focus more on how peers could alleviate the situation and give better options to individuals feeling the frustrations of being an introvert as they grow towards maturity.
The teacher of Charlie, in the person of Professor Bill, was more developed in the film compared to the treatment that his character receives in the story.
Like any other professor dealing with teenage students, Bill is shown to be the one to have ignited the passion among his students especially among individuals like Charlie; giving them the chance to realize their worth at a better light.
Presenting Charlie to be more religious in the film apart from that of the actual setup of the story where his family background is pointed out to have some basis on atheism especially on the part of his grandfather.
On the part where Charlie provides Patrick with a suicidal poem, it was removed on the film. Relatively reducing the dreadful events on the story to ease out the plot for the viewers makes the movie more acceptable and specifically entertaining than disturbing.
Considering the different points of comparison and differentiation between the plot of the story used in the film and the book, it could be analyzed that most of the differences account for the audiences to whom the works are dedicated to.
For instance, readers have more time to seek a relative understanding of the entire narration especially on the way they ought to perceive every turn of event in the story. This is however impossible for those viewing the movie; the audience are compromised to realize the value of the story based on what the directors want to send out as means of message for them to analyze.
While readers are able to deduct the meaning of each event more deeply, viewers are more confined to what the creators want to show them.
Considerably, it is this particular point of presentation that makes it harder for film makers to insert every detail that is stipulated in most reading materials.A severely burned teenager.
A guitar. Punk rock. The chords of a rock 'n' roll road trip in a coming-of-age novel that is a must-read story about finding your place in . Sep 08, · A guide to all the films headed to theaters this season.
The novella “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” by Stephen Chbosky is story about the complexities of a developing teenager. The book is about a year-old boy named Charlie who writes letters to his imaginary friend. ‘The Perks of Being a Wallflower’ is told in a series of letters that were addressed from the main character, Charlie, to an anonymous reader as an outlet for his fears.
Charlie is a freshman in high school and is just starting to learn to accept and identify who he really is. After loosing his [ ]. There’s nothing better than an inspirational romance movie, and there’s nothing more heartbreaking than a dramatic film about a love that never quite made it.
We love stories about all kinds of love, but especially the unrequited kind. What are the best movies about unrequited love? Vote up the. Changing In “The Perks of Being a Wallflower,” by Stephen Chbosky, Charlie, a freshman in high school, grows from being someone who sits by and watches life, to a person who fully participates in life.